Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01169
Original file (BC 2009 01169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01169 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her date of separation (DOS) be changed from 30 July 2008 to 
2 January 2009 in order to keep her active duty promotion to the 
grade of major with a date of rank (DOR) and effective date of 
1 January 2009. 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She spoke with the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) to 
discuss her transition from the Regular Air Force (RegAF) to 
the Reserves and her existing active duty promotion to major. 
She submitted a request for an accelerated promotion in 
accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion, 
Continuation and Selective Early Removal in the Reserve of the 
Air Force and requested a 31 July 2008 promotion to the grade of 
major pin on date. ARPC informed her the Academy position was 
not considered a “position” IAW AFI 36-2504 because it was 
unfunded. A 30 July 2008 DOS was requested based on counseling 
from ARPC that her promotion to the grade of major would carry 
over to the Reserves. She wanted to live closer to her family 
during the last eight months of her husband’s deployment to 
Afghanistan. Otherwise she would have stayed to keep her 
pending promotion to the grade of major. ARPC stated there was 
no exception to policy and 2 June 2010 was the earliest she 
could be promoted to the grade of major. She was unaware the 
new position would prevent her from receiving an accelerated 
promotion to the grade of major. 

 

In support of her request, applicant provides a copy of a 
memorandum recommending her for promotion to the Reserve grade 
of major. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 


 

On 2 June 1999, applicant entered the RegAF and was 
progressively promoted to the grade of captain, having assumed 
that grade effective and with a DOR of 2 June 2003. 

 

The applicant met and was selected for promotion to the grade of 
major by the CY07A Major Central Selection board that convened 
at the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) on 10 September 2007. 

 

Effective 30 July 2008, she was separated (Resignation) from 
active duty after serving 9 years, 1 month and 29 days on active 
duty. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOO makes no recommendation and states that had the 
applicant remained on active duty she would have been promoted 
to the grade of major with a DOR and effective date of 1 January 
2009. 

 

The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
change her DOS and does not believe she should be credited with 
active service she did not perform. 

 

The complete DPSOS evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. 

 

ARPC/DPB recommends denial and states the applicant's active-
duty promotion transferred to the Reserves with a DOR and 
effective date to the grade of major established as 2 June 
2010. This action was based on current Reserve requirements 
for in-the-promotion zone (IPZ) promotions. On 18 April 2008, 
a request for an accelerated promotion with a DOR and effective 
date of 31 July 2008 was requested. The criteria for an 
accelerated promotion established in AFI 36-2504 states that an 
officer must be assigned to the Selected Reserve Program. She 
is not assigned to the Selected Reserve but in the Individual 
Ready Reserve (IRR) as an Air Force Academy Liaison officer. 
As such, she is not eligible for accelerated promotion in this 
category. 

 

The complete DPB evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 


 

 

 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 31 July 2009 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit 
E). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record and careful 
consideration of the applicant's contentions, we find no evidence 
that her DOS or DOR to the grade of major are erroneous and are 
not persuaded by her assertions that she has been the victim of 
an error or injustice. Therefore, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or injustice. Absent persuasive evidence to the contrary, we 
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought 
in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

DETERMINATION OF THE BOARD: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that 
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered BC-2009-01169 in 
Executive Session on 8 October 2009 under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 


 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

, Member 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-01169 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 March 2009, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 30 April 2009. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 23 June 2009, w/atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, ARPC/DPB, dated 21 July 2009. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 July 2009. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01169

    Original file (BC-2009-01169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She submitted a request for an accelerated promotion in accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion, Continuation and Selective Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force and requested a 31 July 2008 promotion to the grade of major pin on date. The complete DPSOS evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ARPC/DPB recommends denial and states the applicant's active- duty promotion transferred to the Reserves with a DOR and effective date to the grade of major established as 2...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01303

    Original file (BC-2005-01303.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of her selection to major in Apr 01, her active duty supervisor was not informed by the 12 MSS/DPMPEP (officer promotions) or by the AFPC/CCR (Reserve Advisor) that he could accelerate her promotion in accordance with AFI 36-2504, paragraph 6.5. The also noted the applicant’s statement she was notified of promotion by her supervisor on 17 Apr 01. According to ARPC/DPB, information...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200272

    Original file (0200272.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    As she had been filling a lieutenant colonel position, she would have been eligible to be promoted to the grade of major, effective with the validation of her position by the Air Force, via an accelerated promotion. She was considered and selected for promotion to the grade of major, with a date of rank of 1 October 2001 (Exhibit B). Based on these circumstances and the fact that she had been filling a lieutenant colonel’s position, her senior rater recommended her for an accelerated...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00349

    Original file (BC-2005-00349.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    All officers selected for promotion by this board were promoted no earlier than this date, unless a request for accelerated promotion was received from the senior rater. The applicant provides another memo from the commander to the senior rater, also dated 20 Jul 04, requesting the applicant be given an accelerated promotion to major with a DOR of 15 Apr 04 (Exhibit A). The 2 Jun 04 DOR was not authorized because the FY04 board did not select the applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01945

    Original file (BC-2007-01945.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His PED and date of rank (DOR) from the U0408A major’s board (FY08 Line and Health Professions Major Position Vacancy Promotion (PV) Selection Board, Feb 07) was based on completion of time in grade (TIG) of four years, public release date of the board results or the signature of the approval authority, whichever was later. The applicant received the original DOR of 29 Mar 07, with an effective date...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02745

    Original file (BC-2011-02745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Before joining the Air Force Reserve, he was selected for promotion to major by the Calendar Year 2006B (CY06B) Active Duty board in Sep 06. AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion, Continuation, and Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force, paragraph 6.4, states that any officer selected for promotion to a higher grade, who transfers from the ADL to the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) of the same armed force, will receive their promotion providing the officer remains in the same competitive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02698

    Original file (BC-2011-02698.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A break in service which was corrected by the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR) caused his DOR to major to be incorrect. The applicant was considered and selected by the CY10 major promotion board with a DOR of 1 October 10. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02956

    Original file (BC-2007-02956.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommends the requested relief be denied. No documentation has been provided by the applicant’s previous command to indicate that they are in support of his request; or that they were given erroneous information regarding accelerated promotion. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Oct 07.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202026

    Original file (0202026.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter recommending the accelerated promotion requested a DOR of 15 Sep 99. It is further recommended that he be considered for promotion by a Special Review Board (SRB) and that his record be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not selected by the FY03 Line and Nonline Colonel Selection Board, which convened in October 2002; if he is recommended for promotion by a Special Review Board, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records be advised...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02114

    Original file (BC-2003-02114.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommended denial noting the applicant's admission that she met the requirements for accelerated promotion when the results of the FY01 Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board were publicly released on 29 Sep 00. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to...